K 10
svn:author
V 7
attilio
K 8
svn:date
V 27
2008-02-06T00:04:09.000000Z
K 7
svn:log
V 464
Really, no explicit checks against against lock_class_* object should be
done in consumers code: using locks properties is much more appropriate.
Fix current code doing these bogus checks.

Note: Really, callout are not usable by all !(LC_SPINLOCK | LC_SLEEPABLE)
primitives like rmlocks doesn't implement the generic lock layer
functions, but they can be equipped for this, so the check is still
valid.

Tested by: matteo, kris (earlier version)
Reviewed by: jhb

END