K 10
svn:author
V 5
peter
K 8
svn:date
V 27
1997-10-15T14:06:15.000000Z
K 7
svn:log
V 528
Give up on the "try and compensate for broken programs" cruft and revert
back to the original single nanosleep() implementation.  This is POSIX and
Unix98 (aka single-unix spec v2) compliant behavior.  If a program sets
alarm(2) or an interval timer (setitimer(2)) without a SIGALRM handler
being active, sleep(3) will no longer absorb it, and the program will get
what it asked for..... :-]

The original reason for this in the first place (apache) doesn't seem to
need it anymore, according to Andrey.

Reviewed by: ache, bde

END