K 10
svn:author
V 3
bde
K 8
svn:date
V 27
1995-07-11T18:50:47.000000Z
K 7
svn:log
V 447
Rearrange the inner loop of scanc() to get better code on i*86's
(on an i486, 10 cycles (+ cache misses) instead of 15).  The
change should be a no-op if the compiler is any good.  The best
possible i*86 code for the same algorithm is only 1 more cycle
faster on i486's so I don't want to bother implementing an
assembler version.

scanc() is a bottleneck for OPOST processing.  It is naturally
about 4 times as slow as bcopy() on 32-bit systems.

END