K 10
svn:author
V 5
remko
K 8
svn:date
V 27
2006-08-12T19:44:22.000000Z
K 7
svn:log
V 585
OK after some more discussions with Simon it appeared that the ,2
marked all future releases of squirrelmail as vulnerable.

The negative side-effect of PORTEPOCH.  Split the previous entry
into two seperated entries again, restoring the old entry for
squirrelmail, and having the 'new' entry for ja-squirrelmail.

This would grab any future versions of ja-squirrelmail if it were
to be readded, and does not conflict with future versions of
squirrelmail.

For more information about the portepoch discussion etc:
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-vuxml/2006-July/000185.html

END