K 10
svn:author
V 4
kris
K 8
svn:date
V 27
2000-02-02T19:41:33.000000Z
K 7
svn:log
V 444
(Forced commit) Looking at the changelog for delegate, the particular
buffer overflow referenced in the previous commit may have been fixed, but
this is one of the most insecure pieces of code you could possibly imagine -
I wouldn't be surprised if there are remote buffer overflows in almost
every aspect of the code. I don't know that it could be fixed without a
total rewrite :-(

To quote the original Bugtraq message: "Just don't use it".

END